Skip to content

Blog

Unpicking the productivity puzzle – What have we learnt from the UK’s Business Basics Programme?

28 February 2024

James Phipps, Rob Fuller

Share this page

This is an updated version of a previous blog published in 2022  following the publication of our full evaluation report.

The question of how to raise productivity among small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) has long presented a challenge to policymakers around the world. The UK in particular has some of the most productive businesses in the world, but also a large number of SMEs with relatively low levels of productivity.

In 2018, the UK government’s business department worked with Innovate UK and IGL to launch an innovative approach to this problem, creating a fund to experiment with interventions to boost productivity among SMEs. Under the Business Basics Programme, business-support providers – including public-sector and private sector organisations, universities, local councils and others – were invited to test approaches to promoting adoption of technologies and management practices that are thought to have the potential to increase productivity. Seventeen of the projects funded were set up as randomised controlled trials (RCTs), intended to generate robust evidence about the effectiveness of the interventions. The other 15 projects were conceived as proof of concept pilots, aimed at exploring the potential of interventions at an earlier stage of development.

These initiatives varied in how successful they were. Some projects didn’t take off, due to implementation difficulties, a lack of engagement from SMEs, or – in the last two years – the disruption caused by the Covid-19 pandemic. But this was to be expected: the Business Basics Programme enabled organisations to take risks with novel ideas and to learn lessons while testing at a relatively small scale. The commitment to evaluation meant that teams were able to identify the sources of ‘failure’ and generate evidence to inform the design of future programmes.

On the other hand, several of the interventions have proven effective – meaning that they demonstrated at least the initial changes in business behaviour that is believed will drive productivity and growth in the longer term. Here are some of the most positive results we’ve seen from RCTs funded under Business Basics:

In each of these cases, there is strong potential for rolling out the interventions at larger scale, using this as an opportunity to examine the longer-term impacts that were beyond the scale and scope of these initial trials.

In addition to the RCT results, many of the interventions that were tested at a smaller scale under Business Basics were well received by participants and are good candidates for further testing. These are some of the promising approaches that have generated interest when shared with policymakers:

Of course, even the programmes that were less successful in terms of immediate delivery,  have generated a wealth of insights about how to design and implement business-support programmes and what pitfalls should be avoided. IGL has reviewed what can be learned from the Business Basics portfolio in the programme’s final report – do have a look.

We believe that the Business Basics Programme has demonstrated the value of taking an experimental approach to policymaking, making it possible to fail early and learn fast. If you’d like to talk to us about the potential for experimentation, whether applied to individual interventions or within an overall programme such as Business Basics, then get in touch with us at [email protected].